Chamaenerion danielsii (D. Löve) Czerep. (Onagraceae) во флоре Восточной Европы

Ганчев ИВ. Върбовки, Върболикови — Onagraceae Juss. // Флора на Народна Република България. Т. 7. София, 1979. C. 447–479.

Диклић Н. Фам. Oenotheraceae Wettst. // Флора СР Србиjе. Т. 5. Београд, 1973. С. 8–34.

Цвелёв Н. Н. О роде Chamaenerion Ség. (Onagraceae) на Кавказе // Новости систематики высших растений. 2014. Т. 45. С. 42–50.

Baldwin S. J., Husband B. C. Genome duplication and the evolution of conspecific pollen precedence // Proc. Roy. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 2011. Vol. 278. P. 2011–2017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2208

Baldwin S. J., Husband B. C. The association between polyploidy and clonal reproduction in diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium // Molec. Ecol. 2013. Vol. 22. P. 1806–1819. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12217

Baum D. A., Sytsma K. J., Hoch P. C. A. Phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences // Syst. Bot. 1994. Vol. 19, № 3. P. 363–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419763

Burton T. L., Husband B. C. Fitness differences among diploids, tetraploids, and their triploid progeny in Chamerion angustifolium: Mechanisms of inviability and implications for polyploid evolution // Evolution. 2000. Vol. 54. P. 1182–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00553.x

Burton T. L., Husband B. C. Fecundity and offspring ploidy in matings among diploid, triploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae): consequences for tetraploid establishment // Heredity. 2001. Vol. 87. P. 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00955.x

Chen C.-J., Hoch P. C., Raven P. H. Systematics of Epilobium (Onagraceae) in China // Syst. Bot. Monogr. 1992. Vol. 34. P. 1–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/25027806

Chen C.-J., Hoch P. C., Raven P. H. Chamerion (Rafinesque) Rafinesque ex Holub // Flora of China. Vol. 13: Clusiaceae through Araliaceae. Beijing; St. Louis, 2007. P. 409–411.

Haussknecht H. C. Monographie der Gattung Epilobium. Jena, 1884. 318 S.

Husband B. C. Constraints on polyploid evolution: A test of the minority cytotype exclusion principle // Proc. Roy. Soc. London. B. Biol. Sci. 2000. Vol. 267. P. 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.0990

Husband B. C., Ozimec B., Martin S. L., Pollock L. Mating consequences of polyploid evolution in flowering plants: Current trends and insights from synthetic polyploids // Int. J. Pl. Sci. 2008. Vol. 169. P. 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/523367

Husband B. C., Sabara H. A. Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae) // New Phytol. 2003. Vol. 161, № 3. P. 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2004.00998.x

Husband B. C., Schemske D. W. The effect inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae): Implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression // Evolution. 1997. Vol. 51. P. 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03657.x

Husband B. C., Schemske D. W. Cytotype distribution at a diploid–tetraploid contact zone in Chamerion (Epilobium) angustifolium (Onagraceae) // Amer. J. Bot. 1998. Vol. 85. P. 1688–1694. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446502

Husband B. C., Schemske D. W. Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium // J. Ecol. 2000. Vol. 88. P. 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00481.x

Husband B. C., Schemske D. W., Burton T. L., Goodwillie C. Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium // Proc. Roy. Soc. London. B. Biol. Sci. 2002. Vol. 269. P. 2565–2571. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2196

Katinas L., Crisci J. V., Wagner W. L., Hoch P. C. Geographical diversification of tribes Epilobeae, Gongylocarpeae and Onagreae (Onagraceae) in North America, based on parsimony analysis of endemicity and track compatibility analysis // Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2004. Vol. 91. P. 159–185.

Kennedy B. F., Sabara H. A., Haydon D., Husband B. C. Pollinator-mediated assortative mating in mixed ploidy populations of Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae) // Oecologia. 2006. Vol. 150. P. 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0536-7

Levin R. A., Wagner W. L., Hoch P. C., Hahn W. J., Rodriguez A., Baum D. A., Katinas L., Zimmer E. A., Sytsma K. J. Paraphyly in the tribe Onagreae: Insight into phylogenetic relationships of Onagraceae based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data // Syst. Bot. 2004. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364404772974293

Löve A. The biological species concept and its evolutionary structure // Taxon. 1964. Vol. 13. P. 33–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1216308

Martin S. L., Husband B. C. Adaptation of diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium to elevation but not local environment // Evolution. 2013. Vol. 67, № 6. P. 1780–1791. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12065

Mosquin T. A new taxonomy for Epilobium angustifolium L. (Onagraceae) // Brittonia. 1966. Vol. 18. P. 167–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/2805200

Mosquin T, Small E. An example of parallel evolution in Epilobium (Onagraceae) // Evolution. 1971. Vol. 25, № 4. P. 678–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1971.tb01925.x

Nieto Feliner G. Epilobium L. // Flora Iberica. Vol. 8. Madrid, 1997. P. 101–131.

Raven P. H. Generic and sectional delimitation in Onagraceae, tribe Epilobieae // Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1976. Vol. 63. P. 326–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2395311

Sabara H. A., Kron P., Husband B. C. Cytotype coexistence leads to triploid hybrid production in a diploid-tetraploid contact zone of Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae) // Amer. J. Bot. 2013. Vol. 100, № 5. P. 962–970. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200583

Solbreck C., Andersson D. Vertical distribution of fireweed, Epilobium angustifolium, seeds in the air // Canad. J. Bot. 1987. Vol. 65. P. 2177–2178. https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-299

Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Schemske D. W., Hancock J. F., Thompson J. N., Husband B. C., Judd W. S. Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of species? // Taxon. 2007. Vol. 56, № 1. P. 13–30.

Soons M. B., Ozinga W. A. How important is long-distance seed dispersal for the regional survival of plant species? // Diversity a. Distrib. 2005. Vol. 11. P. 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00148.x

Tacik T. Rodzina: Oenotheraceae, Wiesiołkowate // Flora Polska. Vol. 8, cz. 5. Warszawa, 1959. P. 209–261.